Reading time: ~4 min read
The admission that Darwinists fail to hide behind their language of denial is expressed as follows by various scientists and Darwinists themselves.
Biologist William Fix:
Scientists at the forefront of inquiry have put the knife to classical Darwinism. They have not gone public with this news, but have kept it in their technical papers and inner counsels.190
Darwinist anthropologist Robert A. Martin:
In 1972 Niles Eldredge of the American Museum of Natural History and Steven Jay Gould of Harvard University published a paper introducing the concept of "punctuated equilibrium." If evolution progresses in a slow, methodical, and gradual fashion, they asked, where are all the fossil intermediates between species? Perhaps they are difficult to find because they do not exist.191
Darwinist T. H. Frazzetta from the University of Illinois Ecology Department:
With each passing year the once rather simplistic views on evolution continue to crumble.192
French Darwinist Jean Pierre Lehman:
Darwinism in its ancient and classical form has broken down.193
The Darwinist and Science editor Gordon Rattray Taylor:
And be that as it may, the evidence is accumulating that chance is insufficient to explain the appearance of marvelously coordinated structures and perfectly adapted behavior which biologists are uncovering. As two American biologists have recently declared: 'The main puzzle, the problem of the mechanism of evolution, is far from being solved.'194
In short, the dogma which has dominated much biological thinking for more than a century is collapsing..
Darwinist and Professor of Physics H. S. Lipson:
And be that as it may, the evidence is accumulating that chance is insufficient to explain the appearance of marvelously coordinated structures and perfectly adapted behavior which biologists are uncovering. As two American biologists have recently declared: 'The main puzzle, the problem of the mechanism of evolution, is far from being solved.'195
In short, the dogma which has dominated much biological thinking for more than a century is collapsing.
Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Darwinist E. O. Wiley:
(Norman) MacBeth suggests that we try to look at evolution with new eyes, that we admit to the public, and, if needed, to ourselves, that we have misgivings about Darwinism, and the synthetic theory, that we open debate. I think these are excellent suggestions.196
Journalist Larry Witham:
I interviewed dozens and dozens of scientists and, when they're amongst each other or talking to a journalist who they trust, they'll speak about 'It's incredibly complex' or 'Molecular Biology is in a crisis', but, publicly, they can't say that.197
That is where Darwinism is now. Darwinists now doubt the theory they espoused so fanatically for many years. The global deception that is Darwinism has now come to an end.
The passionate adherents of Darwinism perhaps never imagined until now that they would lose this war they declared against belief in Allah (surely Allah is beyond that). The means at their disposal, the circles they influenced, and the support they received from various states led them to regard themselves as, superficially at least, very powerful. The teaching of the theory of evolution in schools led to new generations being brought up with the idea of evolution. The world's leading newspapers, magazines and television stations constantly engaged in, and, more importantly, people at the highest levels in national administrations also supported and promoted Darwinism. As in recent times, forces such as the European Council, representing countries, were easily able to take and implement pro-Darwinist decisions.
But these methods no longer do Darwinists any good.
The difference between today and the past is that these decisions taken at international assemblies used to have an effect on people and it was easier to achieve the aim of drawing people under the spell of Darwinism closer into its orbit.
These things are all definitely a sign of defeat. They show how effective the scientific and rationally intellectual campaign against Darwinism has been.
"There is no fight against the creationists now. They have won the war … In 1998, I was able to motivate six members of the Turkish Academy of Sciences to speak out against the creationist movement. Today, it's impossible to motivate anyone."198
Nobody of course will attempt to propagate Darwinism on the conference floor in the full knowledge that it is untrue and has been exposed. The Darwinists have no scientific evidence and no scientific statement they can produce against the fact of Creation.
The lifting of the Darwinist spell has, without doubt, done away with Darwinism altogether because they attempted to keep this perverse religion propped up by maintaining the Darwinist spell. When that spell was lifted, the theory was left with nothing to cling to since it had no scientific foundations. Darwinism will seem as ludicrous to future generations as the stories that people told, with utter conviction, in the distant past about the Earth resting on the back of a giant tortoise. People will be unable to comprehend how Nobel Prize-winning professors, university teachers and scientists believed in such a farce and were led to encourage such nonsense. The 20th Century will go down as one of shame for all Darwinist scientific circles.
References
- William Fix, The Bone Peddlers, New York, Mcmillan, 1984, pp. 179-180 - Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 219 ↩
- Robert A. Martin, Missing Links, Jones and Barlett Publishers, UK, 2004, p. 55 ↩
- Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, Sphere Books Ltd., 1984, p. 11 ↩
- Ibid. ↩
- Ibid. p. 15 ↩
- H. S. Lipson, "A Physicist Looks at Evolution", Physics Bulletin, vol. 31, 1980, p. 138 - Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 220 ↩
- E. O. Wiley, "Review of Darwin Retried by by MacBeth", Systematic Zoology, vol. 24, 1975, p. 270 - Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 225 ↩
- Ben Stein, Expelled "No Intelligence Allowed", 2008 ↩
- Robert Koeing, Creationism Takes Root Where Europe, Asia Meet, Science, 18 May2001, Vol. 292. no. 5520, pp. 1286 - 1287 ↩