Reading time: ~4 min read
Aiming accusations at the other side is perhaps the best-known tactic of psychological warfare. In a struggle waged by imputing one's own flaws and deficiencies, or things one is accused of doing to the other side, the party that implements this tactic imagines that whoever wages this kind of propaganda more powerfully will win. In other words, if the side that is guilty and in the wrong makes good use of this propaganda, then it will appear to be in the right and the aggrieved party and thus, it imagines, will win the struggle.
This familiar tactic has been blatantly applied by Darwinists in recent times. Even though it is Darwinists who engage in fraud, espouse a deception, who are irrational and illogical and who deceive other people, they try to convince people that it is those who deny evolution who are espousing illogical ideas. Darwinists imagine that if they can make people believe this lie, if they can mislead people thoroughly and effectively enough, then they will achieve success. They think this devilish tactic will work out best for them and that it will cover up all the frauds they perpetrate. But they are forgetting one very important thing; superstition is never victorious. This is the law of Allah. The justice of our Almighty Lord Allah will definitely be done. Almighty Allah knows the truth and who shelters behind deception, and He will eliminate superstition and strengthen the. Allah states in one verse that:
Over the years, when false tactics developed against the fact of creation seemed to be very effective, Darwinists have launched various false accusations and imputations against those who speak of Creation. In fact, Darwinists' false accusations of believers have been made throughout history and are things foretold as happening in the Qur'an. Almighty Allah, Lord of the Earth and Sky, describes the position of those who make false accusations in the words:
The reason why Darwinists make these accusations is no doubt because they are aware that creation is an absolute truth. The reason behind their foolish mockery is that they know their theories are not corroborated by any scientific findings or evidence, and they therefore try to dazzle people with verbiage instead. Berkeley University Professor of Law Phillip E. Johnson says this about the tactic:
... the students would also need to learn about such things as the defects in the peppered moth story, the fraud in the Haeckel embryo drawings, the mystery of Cambrian explosion and what the leading Darwinists really believe about the implications of Darwinism for religion. Before this education went very far, the authorities would have a mutiny on their hands. The Darwinists cannot change their tactics because any true education in evolution would cast the clear light of analysis on assumptions that cannot survive it.176
By any realistic definition naturalism is a religion, and an extremely dogmatic one. It rests on a basic conviction about ultimate reality that is held by a kind of faith, and it incorporates its own definitions of "knowledge" and "reason." It says that knowledge comes ultimately from our senses and that the more complex forms of knowledge come from scientific investigation. By naturalistic definition there can be no such thing as knowledge of the supernatural. Statements about God are either non-rational or irrational (if they purport to make objective factual claims). (Surely Allah is beyond that.)
But it is actually naturalism and materialism that are totally irrational. The followers of these perverse beliefs ascribe the power to create to chance, coincidence and unconscious phenomena (surely Allah is beyond that) and are devoid of any power of rational judgment. What the adherents of a perverse religion that ascribes divinity to chance refer to as "knowledge" is based on the idea that chance created everything out of nothing. So what we are talking about here consists of a perverse belief system with no room for reason and logic. For that reason, it will not be hard to see that it is impossible to refer to such concepts as reason or information when dealing with naturalism, materialism and Darwinism.
Darwinists are terrified of the widespread discussion of the fact of Creation and of people being convinced of it. They know that there are countless pieces of evidence corroborating the fact of creation, and that nobody seeing these will ever be taken in again by the deception that is evolution. On the other hand, there exists not one piece of evidence to support Darwinism. That is why people who espouse this terrible deception foolishly criticize belief in creation. The University of New York professor of chemistry and evolutionist Robert Shapiro makes the irrational statement that he will support Darwinism to the bitter end, even if the results do not corroborate the theory of evolution:
Some future day may yet arrive when all reasonable chemical experiments run to discover a probable origin for life have failed unequivocally. Further, new geological evidence may indicate a sudden appearance of life on the earth. Finally, we may have explored the universe and found no trace of life, or process leading to life, elsewhere. In such case, some scientists might choose to turn to religion for an answer. Others, however, myself included, would attempt to sort out the surviving less probable scientific explanations in hope of selecting one that is still more likely than the remainder.177
References
- Phillip E. Johnson, Evolution Trial, 2003, p. 125 ↩