They Try to Distract People With Fine Detail

Confusing details and ridiculous reports represent an important part of Darwinist psychological defense mechanisms. Inundating people with illogical details is one part of the Darwinist's hypnotic indoctrination technique. The real aim behind reports appearing in Darwinist publications is to make some people, who have little knowledge of the subject, forget that evolution is a fraud and thereby occupy their minds with exceedingly foolish questions, such as, “Are we more closely related to the potato or the worm?” Darwinists use illogical details for that purpose.

The true aim behind all of the utterly illogical reports in a Darwinist publication, such as “Are we related to kangaroos?”, “We started to walk upright out of hunger”, or “Hiccupping is a legacy from the frog”, is to distract people’s attention. By positing evolution as though it were a proven fact, they strive to give the impression that the only remaining question is where hiccupping came from. People who fall under the intense influence of such reports, and who are inadequately informed on the subject can easily fall victim to such conditioning. Under the influence of these misleading reports, they imagine that just a few minor aspects of evolution still need to be explained and that they, too, will eventually be clarified. Darwinists thus perpetrate the mass deception they have engaged in for decades by way of this system. Darwinist indoctrination is successfully propagated by this false method.

Let us now remind ourselves that:

• Darwinists are unable to explain how even a single protein might have formed by chance.
• They possess not one transitional fossil they can produce.
• More than 350 million fossils have demolished evolution.
• The complexity in living things has dealt Darwinism one of the heaviest blows, and revealed biological systems that cannot be explained in terms of evolution.
• All the fossils they have heralded have turned out to be false, or even deliberate fakes.
• Fossils show that living things appeared suddenly and remained unchanged for millions of years.

These things are scientific evidence. Since Darwinists are unable to explain them, they produce extraordinarily ridiculous headlines instead because they are in a state of desperation. How else, apart from using fraud, could they defend a theory launched in the name of science, but in fact devoid of any scientific evidence? But they have now realized that these illogical headlines no longer have any impact. Even schoolchildren now expect Darwinists to be able to account for the formation of a single protein when they encounter such claims. So this particular deception has not been long-lived.